“The development of gender equality for Moroccan women – illusion or reality?”: A Review

, , No Comments
Desrues, T., & Nieto, M. J. (2009). The development of gender equality for Moroccan women – illusion or reality? Journal of Gender Studies, 18(1), 25-34.


            The article under review is written by Thierry Desrues and Juana Moreno Nieto and published in the Journal of Gender Studies by Routledge. As its title suggests, the aim of the article is to examine whether the development of gender equality in Morocco is an illusion or reality. In the abstract and introduction, the authors further clarify this aim, stating that they attempt to analyze the extent to which the situation of Moroccan women has improved and whether there is “real change” (Desrues & Nieto, 2009, pp. 25-26). In the abstract, the authors state their two findings. The first is that “although real progress has been made over the last 50 years, there is still much more to be achieved.” The second is that “there are indications that the incipient participation by women in the public sphere too often continues to reproduce schemes of subordination” (p. 25). Considering social change as a multidimensional process, the authors divide their analysis into four sections, each dealing with one broad dimension. This review keeps the same organization; a summary and critique of each section is provided before moving to the following section.

Socio-demographic variables of change
            The first section, entitled “Socio-demographic variables of change,” includes three subsections, each analyzing one socio-demographic variable. First of all, it should be noted that the authors moved directly to the analysis without providing a literature review, given that they are speaking of findings, hence the need for a review of previous findings. Concerning the section in question, the authors open it with the broad, unsupported statement that “wide consensus exists regarding the socio-demographic variables that play a key role in identifying the processes of social change” (p. 26), to justify their choice of the three variables they are about to analyze. These socio-demographic variables are “access to education, the postponement of marriage and declining average number of children per women, as well as the effects that these phenomena have on the concept of family” given that they are “some of the most relevant factors for understanding the situation of women” (p. 26).

            In the subsection entitled “Education: the driving force behind change,” the authors use statistics from official reports and other references about “schooling and diminishing drop-out rates” in K-12 and higher education and compare the percentages of the two sexes in the post-independence as well as contemporary Morocco (pp. 26-27). Concerning contemporary Morocco, the statistics cited by the authors show that there is a very insignificant discrepancy between the sexes in terms of access to education, especially in urban areas (pp. 26-27). The authors conclude, “the progress made since independence in terms of education is real, but continues to be insufficient, especially with regard to women in rural areas” (p. 27). It should be noted that this subsection has few weaknesses. For instance, contrary to the authors’ idea that education “constitutes a true break with the past” (p. 26), K-12 and higher education in Morocco, being unsecular, is arguably used for patriarchal indoctrination. In other words, Moroccan girls have equal access to education, but they are not educated to believe in total gender equality. Another weakness is that the authors consider the variables of access to jobs and political participation as merely derivatives of the variable of education. Instead of treating them as separate variables, given their importance, they very briefly analyze them at the end of the subsection on education. 

            In the second subsection, entitled “Changes in family size and composition,” the authors use family size and composition as the second socio-demographic variable for evaluating the development of gender equality in Morocco. Using statistical evidence, the authors affirm that there is a shift “from large to small families” and “from multigenerational to nuclear households” as well as a decrease in the number of children per woman, concluding that such shifts indicate “the growing power of women as wives” (p. 28). However, since the aim of the article is to evaluate gender equality in Morocco, it should be noted that while changes in family size and composition may be a sign of the improvement of Moroccan women’s situation, as the authors state, these changes are not necessarily a sign of the rise of equality-based families. Nuclear families are rising, but there remains the question of whether these families are based on the principle of complementarity or equality, a question a quantitative approach may not adequately answer.

            In the third subsection, entitled “The postponement of marriage,” the authors use the postponement of marriage as a socio-demographic variable for evaluating the development of gender equality in Morocco. Using statistical evidence for the growing tendency among Moroccan young people to postpone marriage, the authors develop the idea that such tendency indicates that the institution of marriage in Morocco is being questioned. Yet, the postponement of marriage does not mean “[the] norm is being questioned” (p. 28), nor is it a sign of the development of gender equality. Rather, arguably, the phenomenon is largely a result of socio-economic factors, mainly education and unemployment, the latter of which is considered by the authors as merely part of “other factors” (p. 29). The authors end the subsection with a statistics-based claim without evidence in terms of citation or primary research, only to conclude that “women continue the social trend of marrying older men. If this is the case, it would suggest that hegemonic structures are still being reproduced on some level, where the husband’s authority is grounded in age rather than as solely a product of his gender” (p. 29). Contrary to this statement, what gives Moroccan males their authority in marriage is not their old age but the very status of being an adult male.

Feminist mobilization
            Having analyzed the three socio-demographic variables, the authors move on to the second section entitled “Feminist mobilization.” In this section, they provide a brief review of feminist mobilization in post-independence and contemporary Morocco. The section opens with the idea that the limited access to education by women since independence paved the way for the emergence of educated female elite, some of whom became feminist activists organized under associations like the Democratic Association of Moroccan Women (ADFM) and the Women’s Action Union (UAF) (p. 29). After that, the authors discuss the role of current women’s associations in continuing the feminist battle and their interactions with international feminist and human rights organizations (p. 29). The section closes with a discussion of the achievements of Moroccan feminist associations, some of which are that they managed to make women’s right a public issue rather than a taboo and that their mobilization was appropriated by the king who reserved 30 seats for women from a national list for the elections to the Chamber of Representatives in 2002 and launched the drafting of the new family code in 2003 (pp. 29-30).

The new Family Code
            In the third section, entitled “The new Family Code,” the authors discuss the strengths and limitations of Morocco’s latest family code (2004). They cited one list of the achievements and another of the limitations of the family code (pp. 30-31). The authors affirm that the positive changes brought by the family code are many, at least in theory, but the code has serious limitations (p. 31). The limitations concern legal guardianship of children, repudiation, separation by compensation, inheritance, polygamy, and toleration of certain cases of underage marriage (p. 31). The section closes with a discussion of the difficulties of application of the new code and resistance from conservatists (p. 31).

Opinions about women’s place in society
            The fourth and last section, entitled “Opinions about women’s place in society,” is motivated by the idea that “the extent to which the situation of women in Morocco has changed needs further interrogation,” and that “a subjective dimension should be considered” (p. 31). To this end, the authors use data from the World Values Survey (2001) with the aim of taking into account Moroccans’ opinion about women’s place in society. After summarizing the statistical data, the authors conclude that “although the incorporation of women in the public sphere does not meet with complete rejection, women remain perceived as subordinate to men and their incorporation is in turn conditioned by this subordination” (p. 32).

In the conclusion, the authors provide a summary of their analysis, but it is a summary that highlights some conclusions while overlooks some major ones reached in the analysis, such as the ones on political participation and postponement of marriage (p. 32). The summary is headed by the statement: “In spite of the progress made since independence, the situation of women in Morocco is far from egalitarian” (p. 32). The authors end the article with recommendations for studying “the newly articulated situation” of Moroccan women “in a context such as Morocco that is replete with uncertainties” (p. 32).

To summarize this  review, it can be said that the article is based on the truism that “although real progress has been made over the last 50 years, there is still much more to be achieved” (p. 25), which is true for most Muslim-majority and other third world countries. Truisms are of course worthy of study, but this article provides a very modest analysis of this truism, which may be ascribed to its heavy use of statistics as well as the weaknesses discussed throughout this review and summarized here. The authors speak of findings, but they did not provide a literature review of previous findings on gender equality in Morocco. Besides, they failed to justify their choice of the selected socio-demographic variables. Added to these are the several weaknesses in the subsections on education, family size and composition, and postponement of marriage.


0 comments:

Post a Comment